Why did Pastors Bill Moore and Anne Moore refuse to speak about Richard and Sonia Galvan and South Texas FCA block our messages ?

The South Texas Fellowship of Christian Athletes was notified about Richard Galvan’s prior sexual deviant behavior, as well as Bill Moore and Anne Moore of Livingway Family Church in Brownsville, TX. Richard Galvan served on the board for the FCA and was a member of Livingway Family Church, who according to the Melissa Barrera-Sosa (executive assistant to Bill and Anne Moore) was “a very active member”. The South Texas FCA blocked Blaine from being able to send messages via FB, nor would they speak to him over the phone about the serious allegations. He attempted to reach Nathan Jones (Multi Area Director) and Catherine Bain (Administrative Assistant). Bain also seems to run their FB page, and assumptively is who blocked Blaine from being able to send messages. The National FCA did take the matters serious enough and spoke to the Crews’s Attorney, but none of the leaders at the local level would.

The same can be said of Pastors Bill and Anne Moore of Livingway Family Church in Brownsville, TX who not only refused to speak about the matters, but their executive assistant Melissa Barrera- Sosa filed a sworn affidavit attempting to assist the Galvans by claiming Blaine went from “cordial to upset” when he was notified the pastors wouldn’t speak to him. That would be a normal emotion if an attempt to speak to the head pastors of a church (that assumptively has many young women who attend) refused to speak to you about matters that may protect said young women. It should have been at the very least a simple phone call from the pastors to hear the truth of these allegations for themselves. Instead, Bill Moore and Anne Moore not only refused to speak to the Crews’s or their attorney about the sexaul assault (which was criminal in nature), they seem to have allowed their assistant to assist Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan by filing an affidavit (shown below). Oddly enough, when the Crews’s attorney called Living Way Family Church and spoke to one of the church secretaries, she said Bill and Anne Moore weren’t familiar with the Galvans. This is a lie. Richard Galvan admitted in his depositions that Bill Moore called him and text him regarding this situation multiple times. Their assistant Melissa Barrera- Sosa also states in her affidavit that the Bill Moore and Anne Moore met with Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan. The truth is it seems The Moore’s are trying to cover for a sexual predator, or simply ignoring the truth. Either way, they are failing to do what is necessary to protect the young women of their church. The church has also deleted several comments on their social media platforms regarding the information, and Anne Moore blocked Blaine on social media.

Ideally, when you call to notify a church or school organization about something as disturbing and criminal as what Richard Galvan did to a 17 year old girl they would take the matters extremely serious. When we send our young people to school, or church, we expect the leaders or anyone in authority to be properly vetted for the protection of the students and young people. Also, it should be expected that matters are taken seriously by leadership when an attempt to speak the truth about the sexual assault of a teenage girl occurs. Pastors Bill and Anne Moore should be ashamed of themselves, as well as the behavior of the South Texas FCA. Even after the 13th Court of Appeals Opinion stating it was a matter of public concern, as well as admissions by Richard and Sonia Galvan’s own depositions neither the Administration from the South Texas FCA nor Pastors Bill and Anne more have yet to respond or reach out to the Crews’s or their attorney for comments.

*UPDATE*

After two years of ignoring the facts Livingway sent Blaine a FB message. It speaks for itself. Following the message and “threat” they blocked Blaine from being able to respond, as did the Youth Pastor of Livingway – Ryan Moore. So, the 13th Court of Appeals has deemed the actions of Richard Galvan a matter of public concern, Richard and Sonia’s depositions have admissions of criminal behavior and lies, and Livingway Family Church believes since they didn’t know the Galvan’s when the events took place, it’s none of their business… and we should let it go. The church is supposed to be a place of protection. Also remember- they filed an affidavit in support of the Galvan’s, and now want to act like they’ve had no part in this. They are hiding the truth, and trying to brush it under a rug.

This is the reason sexual predators are able to get away with their actions. Churches like Livingway are clearly only concerned with one thing… and it’s not protecting their young women.

Transcripts from Richard Galvans deposition below in which he acknowledges Pastor Bill Moore took his phone call, as well as called him back after Blaine attempted to reach him regarding Richard’s sexual assault, and criminal behavior. Yet, The Moore’s tried to act like they didn’t really know the Galvans. Oddly enough, Richard admits he called and told Bill Moore that Blaine threatened his children (not true). Richard later admitted in his deposition that was a lie. So- both pastors Bill and Anne Moore know the truth, they just refuse to acknowledge it.

Why would Bill Moore speak to an admitted sexual predator, but not the person speaking the truth regarding the allegations in an attempt to warn him that there was a sexual deviant in his church? Shouldn’t a pastor be concerned enough about the young women in his congregation to at least pick up the phone and call someone trying to speak about something like this? Instead, he has still to this day refused to speak to the Crews’s.

I want this to be clear. I have no ill feelings towards any of Richard or Sonia Galvans children, nor is it their fault that their father is a predator, and their mother is a lying enabler. They are innocent parties. However, Livingway Family Church hired their daughter on staff, and decided it would be a good idea to use her for a video regarding fasting. It wouldn’t normally be an issue, but the fact that there is ANY attempt by this “church” to allow the words “growing up my parents (Richard and Sonia Galvan) did this with us” to be promoted publicly in some way to show them in a good light is abhorrent.

Pastors Bill and Anne Moore have spent years completely silent regarding the truth, and in fact have never once publicly apologized for their lack of concern regarding a predator in their church. Now, it’s clear to say who’s side they are on, and it isn’t the side of truth.

The fact that they would allow a statement to be made by the daughter of a known predator (who the court had already deemed a matter of public concern) and her mother (who was caught in multiple counts of perjury in her deposition) is an attempt to suppress the truth and involvement surrounding the factual allegations made regarding the assault and subsequent lawsuit filed by the Galvans against Richards victim. This is not a real church.

Livingway Family Church posted the above video to their instagram page featuring Richard and Sonia Galvan’s daughter Elliana. Even after the courts determined Richard’s actions were a matter of public concern, they have yet to ever speak to The Crews’s, yet they will allow the daughter of a rapist to praise her parents for being Godly.



See below for the Affidavit of Melissa Barrera-Sosa, Executive Assistant for Livingway Family Church, as well as screenshots from the FCA showing they blocked Blaine from being able to send messages.

Clearly, Blaine was attempting to notify the pastors of Livingway Bill and Anne Moore. He became upset when they refused to speak about the matters. Why are Bill and Anne Moore, along with Melissa-Barerra Sosa attempting to assist a sexual predator?




Bill Moore posted a video to his instagram account about “cleaning your house”. He made comments about how we need to deal with all the things hidden, and make room for God. Well, immediately after posting this comment Blaine was blocked and the comment was deleted. This is the Moore’s M.O. They will tell you to clean your closet out, but block, and delete anyone who is exposing theirs.
What do you expect though when the pastors of a church (after having the knowledge of the events) block the truth tellers, and follow the predators.
The Galvan’s daughter speaking to students at Living Way Family Church in 2018 (around the time they were notified that Richard Galvan was a sexual predator). This was the very reason the church was called and expected to notify their church of a sexual predator in their midst. They failed to do so.
Livingway Church keeps deleting comments and anything related to Richard and Sonia Galvan. Bill and Anne Moore have refused to acknowledge and address the fact that they have had a sexual predator in their church. Even after Richard has admitted it they still refuse to address it, and are only concerned with people not knowing about it. Richard and Sonia Galvan’s daughter is a member of the youth group there.



Showing Livingway Church in Brownsville keeps deleting comments to hide the truth. A church trying to protect a sexual predator. Is this what you would want from your pastors as parents of young women? Oddly enough Melissa-Barrera Sosa is the one singing in the picture.
Shows the “message tab” removed, due to South Texas FCA blocking the ability to send messages from Blaine’s account.
Showing the “send message” tab when logged into a different account. Showing they blocked messages coming from Blaine.



Do parents have the right to know about Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan?

Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan claim in their depositions that they never held any type of leadership roles over youth or young people. There are sworn affidavits from pastors, board members of the church, and former church members that stated what the Galvan’s claim was and is a lie. Secondly, there are numerous news articles where Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan were interviewed as Youth Pastors.

Should Richard or Sonia Galvan be able to have a leadership role in any capacity when it comes to youth or young people, especially young women? Do parents deserve to know the truth of Richard Galvan’s sexual past, as well as he and Sonia Galvan’s countless lies? Richard, along with being on the board for the FCA of South Texas, also participated in the HCISD school system as an “ambassador”. This is clearly a role of leadership and authority. I assume that parents of students want assurance that when they send their child to school they are around upstanding adults and teachers, and not subject to be around men like Richard Galvan, who’s past and actions speak for itself. The same can be said of Sonia Galvan, who has not only lied about her husband’s sexual assault, but has continued to enable the behavior by telling different stories throughout written and oral discovery.

Richard Galvan speaking at an FCA (Fellowship of Christian Athletes) event.
Richard Galvan as an “ambassador” at a local elementary school.
Richard Galvan speaking and listening to elementary aged children at a school

Does this look like a position of authority or leadership?
Richard Galvan “Ambassador of Learning”.
Richard Galvan with staff of elementary school.
Richard Galvan with HCISD
Richard Galvan should have never been let to be around students in the community. He was and continues to be a danger to young women, as the 13th Court of Appeals in Texas as stated it remains a matter of public concern.



Richard Galvan was previously arrested for prostitution.

In his deposition on page 212, Richard Galvan was asked if he had ever been arrested in the past for prostitution. He answered “no”. He was then shown court documents, and an affidavit for Warrant and Arrest by The Crews’s attorney from the District Attorney’s office in Travis County, Texas. After looking at the documents, Richard Galvan once again denied having knowledge of these court or arrest records. His attorney then asked to take a short break to discuss with her client Richard Galvan. After the break, Richard Galvan came back and changed his story, admitted to remembering the events as well as seeing the documents, and mentioned the case had been dismissed. It is amazing what a short break can do to ones memory.

Richard Galvan was also asked whether or not the officer E. Leach (who according to the records was propositioned for oral sex) was a man or a woman. Richard Galvan’s answer was “I don’t recall”. The records indicate that Richard Galvan agreed to engage in sexual conduct for a fee. The affidavit states “Richard Galvan offered and agreed to contact between the mouth of the said Richard Galvan and the genitals of E. Leach for a fee”. It would seem that per the documents, Richard Galvan agreed to perform oral sex on the officer for $15 (Fifteen Dollars). It would also seem that Richard Galvan was the prostitute in this arrest, as he was the one offering and agreeing to perform oral sex on an undercover police officer.

According to the records the charges for prostitution were in fact dismissed, due to the officer/informant being “reassigned and unavailable” for trial. It seems to be another instance of sexual misconduct where Richard Galvan was able to avoid prosecution. Clearly, Richard Galvan has had a long record of sexual deviancies and issues, as well as lying. The documents below are public record directly from the Travis County Courthouse.

Affidavit from Claude Ricks alleging Richard Galvan agreed to contact between the mouth of said Richard Galvan, and the genitals of E. Leach for a fee.
Affidavit from Patricia Barrera alleging Richard Galvan agreed to contact between the mouth of said Richard Galvan, and the genitals of E. Leach for a fee.
Affidavit for warrant of arrest and detention.
Showing Richard Galvan’s signature
Showing the case was dismissed due to the officer being reassigned and unavailable for trial.

Removed articles from various news sources.

All of these news articles were taken by screenshot off of the internet. During the pendency of the lawsuit filed by Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan against the Crews’s, the articles have mysteriously and interestingly been removed. These articles provide evidence that Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan seemingly tampered with the articles to have them removed and pulled off of the internet while also committing perjury in their depositions by denying under oath that they were ever youth pastors.

Valley Morning Star Nov 2007

Valley Morning Star Nov 2007

The Brownsville Herald Nov 2007

Depositions of Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan

Though the Galvan’s both deny (for the first time) that they were youth pastors in their depositions, below is an article from the Valley Morning Star in November, 2007 showing Richard and Sonia Galvan were both interviewed as the acknowledged Youth Pastors of the Northway Bible Church in Harlingen, Texas during all relevant times. There were also articles from The Brownsville Herald. Mysteriously, the articles (which were all searchable on google/yahoo) have since been removed after the lawsuit was filed- assumptively at the request of the Galvans. You can view articles that have been removed here

Along with the articles, the Crews’s provided written affidavits from the Pastor of Northway Bible Church, two former board members, a former youth member, and a church member whose children were a part of the youth group. They all stated under oath in sworn affidavits that the article from the Valley Morning Star was true and correct, and that Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan acted as youth ministers during 2007 when the sexual assault took place.

The Galvan’s had four affidavits, their original pleadings, their amended pleadings, as well as their brief and responses to the Court of Appeals, and not once did they deny their roles as youth ministers. Only until the Crews’s filed their counter-claim and the Galvan’s non-suited their claims for assault, public disclosure of private facts, intentional infliction of emotional distress, as well as the judgement ordered by the court dismissing their defamation per se claim did they decide to make these claims for the very first time.

Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan also for the first time decided to tell a different version of the events. From their first pleading, all the way through the court of appeals, to them non-suiting the rest of their claims, they stated “this is false” in regards to the Crews’s allegations. During their depositions (which was after they lost their defamation lawsuit, and after they non-suited their remaining claims) they decided it would be a good time to blame the victim (Hannah) for the sexual assault. They both claimed and now say that the 100 lb. 17 year old high school teenage girl was the aggressor, and overpowered Richard Galvan in his office against his will. Sonia Galvan (who wasn’t even there) agreed with this version of the events, seemingly by believing her husband’s ridiculous story. They had over a year to tell this story, yet failed to do so and solely stuck to “this is false, this is all false”. They are simply trying to save face at this point by making up things that no reasonably minded person would believe. The Galvan’s quite simply put, are pathological liars.

Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan also both admitted in their depositions that Blaine never threatened them or their children with imminent harm, yet the Galvan’s still sued the Crews’s for assault by threat. They both swore under oath when they signed their pleadings and affidavits, as well as asking for a permanent injunction, that Blaine threatened them and their children’s lives. None of this was true, it never was true, yet the Galvan’s swore under oath that it was. This is just one more example of the countless lies that they have told throughout this case.

Interestingly, the original lawsuit filed by the Galvan’s (now non-suited and/or dismissed) were regarding statements made by Blaine Crews. Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan continued to show their maliciousness by solely deposing Hannah and not Blaine, which has been consistent with the nature of their tactics in this case. The almost one million dollar lawsuit filed by Richard and Sonia Galvan was an attempt to bully, financially damage, and silence the victim (Hannah) and her husband about the sexual assault committed by Richard Galvan. Throughout this case the stories and versions of the events have changed numerous times with the Galvan’s. The Crews’s allegations, timelines, pleadings, and affidavits have stayed consistent throughout the entirety of the case.

You can view the signed orders for fees and sanctions, as well as the judgement dismissing the Galvan’s Defamation Per Se here

Richard Galvan also admitted in his depositions that he didn’t have a college degree, nor did he attend the University of Texas, yet he has claimed that he did. This screen shot taken from google showing Richard Galvan’s website (which was created for paid advertisements and SEO) shows him advertising that he completed his degree at the University of Texas. Also keep in mind this website was created after the depositions. Chalk this up to another lie.

From the description of Richard Galvan’s website, he claims he completed his degree at The University of Texas. In his depositions he admitted he didn’t have a degree.

See below for article from The Valley Morning Star, as well as the full transcripts of Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan’s depositions.

Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan Sanctioned by the Court.

The Crews’s were awarded mandatory sanctions and fees on June 9th, 2020 by the 445th District Court in Cameron County and the Honorable Judge Gloria Rincones. This was in reference to the Crews’s winning their Anti-Slapp which can be found at http://www.crews-vs-richard-galvan-sonia-galvan.com

Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan, who initially brought the lawsuit against the Crews’s are ordered to pay $45,000 in Sanctions to deter them from filing frivolous lawsuits related to this matter again. They are also required to pay attorney fees in the amount of $25,800, and other costs of $1046 .50 and 567.87. All of Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan’s causes of action have either been dismissed or non-suited in this case. Plaintiffs Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan filed a motion for sanctions against the Crews’s as well as a motion for continuance- both of which were denied.

The Crews’s have filed a counter-claim against the Galvan’s for Malicious Prosecution and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress for the filing of their original lawsuit. This counter-suit is ongoing and pending.

Richard Galvan and Sonia Galvan were deposed on May 14th and 15th of 2020. Those depositions are available here , including deposition transcripts and all other relevant court documents at https://portal.co.cameron.tx.us/portalprod then click “smart search” and type “galvan, richard” and find case

2018-DCL-06387Richard Galvan,Sonia Galvan vs. Blaine Crews,Hannah Crews

Verified by MonsterInsights